WebOct 1, 2024 · B11 Explanatory Parentheticals. Regardless of the type of authority you are citing, it is often helpful to include additional information to explain the relevance … WebAug 11, 2024 · The 'Cleaned Up' Parenthetical Is Gaining Traction and Changing Legal Writing Persuasive writing is fundamental to the successful practice of law. But a brief must be readable before it can be...
Reducing legal-writing clutter with (cleaned up) LEGIBLE
WebExplanatory parenthetical phrases are used to show the code location of statutes cited to session laws ( rules 12.2.2 and 12.4) or secondary sources ( rule 12.6 ); to identify useful dates, such as the effective date of a statute ( rules 12.3.2 and 12.4 (e) ); and to indicate the invalidation ( rule 12.7.1 ), repeal ( rule 12.7.2 ), amendment ( … WebRule 10.6.1(b): Clarifies that the “per curiam” parenthetical must be used for all opinions so designated by the court (under the previous rule, such a parenthetical could have been optional). Rule 10.6.1(c): Adds instruction on how to cite to seriatim opinions of the U.S. Supreme Court (pre-1801). Rule 10.6.3: Instruction that parentheticals about a case … safi olive wood
Parentheticals - Bluebook Citation - Swisher Library at Jacksonville
WebDec 9, 2024 · Before the critique, I’ll acknowledge, for the sake of discussion, that explanatory parentheticals can be useful. We lawyers are trained to assimilate them as we read, so they don’t get in the way or get lost as much for lawyer readers as they would for non-lawyer readers. WebApr 5, 2024 · Explanatory Parentheticals Refer to Rule 10.6.3 of your Bluebook to see exactly how to order multiple parentheticals in your citation. If there is a subsequent … WebOct 25, 2011 · explanatory If an explanatory parenthetical contains text that itself requires a “quoting” or “citing” parenthetical, the two parentheticals should be nested: Cooper v. Dupnik, 924 F.2d 1520, 1530-31 (9th Cir. 1991) (holding that the police officers’ actions “did not rise to level of due process violation” (quoting Weissman v. safintra roofing