WebJul 5, 2024 · The thesis of this article centers on the methodology adopted by the Court to create new unenumerated constitutional rights, and how Justice Scalia often rejects such methodology. In doing so, this article provides a critical analysis of the majority opinion in Obergefell v. Hodges, as well as the dissent of Justice Scalia. WebJun 26, 2015 · 12 OBERGEFELL v. HODGES. ROBERTS, C. J., dissenting. opinions of individuals are allowed to control” the Constitution’s meaning, “we have no longer a …
Obergefell v. Hodges / Summary of Decision
WebJul 19, 2015 · Hodges”: Dissenting opinion by Justice Scalia "But what really astounds is the hubris reflected in today’s judicial Putsch. . . . The opinion is couched in a style that is as pretentious as ... hanover county human resources
Justices Thomas, Alito Blast Supreme Court Decision On Same …
WebObergefell v. Hodges is a consolidation of six-lower court cases from Michigan, Ohio, Kentucky and Tennessee. Michigan Case. Originally DeBoer v. Snyder (2014), involved a female couple that was not legally married (only had commitment ceremony due to the state’s ban on same-sex marriages) and wanted to adopt three children. According to the ... WebIn Obergefell v. Hodges (2015), Justice Anthony M. Kennedy delivered the opinion for the 5-4 majority. ... Justice Scalia's dissent in the Obergefell case, in my opinion, was erroneous, and the Supreme Court's decision to weigh in on the issue of same-sex marriage was appropriate. Equal legal protection is guaranteed under the 14th Amendment ... WebJudge Roberts. In his dissent for the Obergefell v. Hodges case, Judge Roberts makes several points. His first is that he feels it is a legislative issue rather than a judicial issue. He feels that the matter is one of creating policy, rather than judging policy on the basis of whether it is constitutional. (pg 3) He feels that the issue the ... chabill\u0027s burbank baton rouge