WebDietrich V The Queen - Background To The Case Background To The Case On 17 December 1986, the accused, a career criminal named Olaf Dietrich, flew from Bangkok, Thailand to Melbourne Airport. He had imported at least seventy grams of heroin, which he concealed within condoms that he had swallowed. Dietrich v The Queen is a 1992 High Court of Australia constitutional case which established a de facto requirement that legal aid be provided to defendants in serious criminal trials. The Court determined an adjournment ought to be granted in such trials where the accused is without legal representation … See more Legal In 1979, the High Court of Australia issued a key ruling clarifying whether a conviction ought to be set aside on the grounds of miscarriage of justice due to not being legally represented. … See more The Court majority found an accused has the right to a fair trial, and that courts possess power to adjourn a matter where necessary to ensure this right is met. Past cases show trial of an unrepresented person accused of a serious offence will result in an unfair trial. See more Dietrich v The Queen has been considered and upheld in contemporary trials. Former Melbourne underworld figure Carl Williams argued at his trial for murder an adjournment … See more Academic literature • Davies, Margaret (2014). "Commentary on Dietrich v R". In Heather, Douglas; Francesca, Bartlett; … See more Special leave to appeal to the High Court was made by Dietrich on the grounds the Court of Appeal erred in law by holding Dietrich did not have a right to be provided with counsel at public expense, and/or by not granting adjournment his lack of representation … See more Dietrich's later life In 1995, Dietrich was convicted of three armed robberies and sentenced to 13 years. After his release in October 2004, he again faced court for firearms charges and then for the murder of security guard Erwin Kastenberger … See more 1. ^ Kift (1997), p. 212. 2. ^ McInnes v R (1979) 143 CLR 575. 3. ^ McInnes v R (1979) 143 CLR 575, p. 577. See more
Trial Without Counsel: Dietrich v the Queen - ResearchGate
WebThe 1992 High Court case Dietrich v The Queen (177 CLR 292) bought attention to exactly this – the rights to a fair trial and fair hearing rights. The High Court case focused on the … WebMarlene Dietrich: 1901–1992 Saksa näyttelijä ja laulaja biseksuaali Ani DiFranco: s. 1970 Yhdysvallat folk-muusikko biseksuaali Beth Ditto: s. 1981 Yhdysvallat muusikko, Gossip-yhtyeen laulaja Carol Ann Duffy: s. 1955 Iso-Britannia runoilija Isadora Duncan: 1887–1927 Yhdysvallat tanssija biseksuaali Eleonora Duse: 1859–1924 cd directory linux
8. Fair Trial - ALRC
WebIn Olaf Dietrich v The Queenthe Australian High Court confirmed that the right to a fair trial is a \ . fundamental prescript of the law of this country’1 and, in serious criminal cases and in the absence of ‘exceptional circumstances’, an accused person who is unable to afford legal represen tation must be provided with counsel at public … WebDIETRICH V THE QUEEN by Paul Ames FairaJJ* BA LLB(Hons) (Canterbury) LLM (ANU) Associate Professor Bond University In AusL~alia it has l:~en customary to force a person who carmot afford legal representation to trial undefended, even in cases of serious crimeoI In Dietrich ~ The Queen2 (’Dietrich) the FuLl Bench of the High Court of Web4.6 In November 1992, a majority of the High Court, in Dietrich v The Queen, decided that where an indigent defendant is charged with a serious criminal offence and, through no … cddiscovery 影响因子