site stats

Daniels v campbell 2004

WebDaniels v Campbell NO and Others 2004 (7) BCLR 735 (CC) Division: Constitutional Court Date: 11/03/2004 Case No: CCT40/03 Before: A Chaskalson, Chief Justice; PN Langa, … WebMar 15, 2024 · In Daniels v Campbell 2004 (5) SA 331 (CC), the Constitutional Court confirmed that the word "spouse" in the MSSA includes widows from monogamous Muslim marriages and that such wives, therefore ...

THE STATUS AND ROLE OF LEGISLATION IN SOUTH …

WebDaniels v Campbell NO and Others,[1] an important case in South African law, was heard in the Constitutional Court[2] on 6 November 2003, with judgment handed down on 11 … WebOct 19, 2024 · Daniels v Campbell NO and Others, an important case in South African law, was heard in the Constitutional Court on 6 November 2003, with judgment handed down … cindy johnson bodybuilder https://bexon-search.com

Daniels v Campbell - Wikiwand

WebThat conclusion coupled with the fact that it is common cause that also the third respondent was married to the deceased, has as an ineluctable consequence that the applicant’s marriage to him was polygynous and distinguishes this matter from Daniels v Campbell NO and Others 2004(5) SA 331 (CC) in which the provisions of the ISA and the MSSA ... WebDaniels v Campbell NO and Others 2004 (7) BCLR 735 (CC) Division: Constitutional Court Date: 11/03/2004 Case No: CCT40/03 Before: A Chaskalson, Chief Justice; PN Langa, … Web2 The definition of spouse for the purpose of the Intestate Succession Act includes: A. A survivor of monogamous Muslim marriage – Daniels v Campbell 2004 (5) SA 331 (CC) Ms. Daniels married her (now) deceased husband by Muslim rites in 1977. The marriage, which was at all times monogamous, was not solemnised by a marriage officer appointed ito … cindy joan crawford

Daniels v Campbell NO and Others 2004 7 BCLR 735 CC .pdf...

Category:Case CCT 40/03 - Southern African Legal Information Institute

Tags:Daniels v campbell 2004

Daniels v campbell 2004

Summary Daniels v Campbell and Others (CCT 40 03) [2004

WebDaniels v Campbell 2004 (5) SA 331 (CC): Legal question before the court: can a spouse to a monogamous Muslim marriage concluded in accordance with Muslim rites (in other … WebJul 13, 2024 · Daniels v. Campbell 2004 (5) SA 331 (CC); Amod v. Multilateral Motor V ehicle Ac-cidents Fund (Comm’n for Gender Equal. Intervening) 1999 (4) SA 1319 (SCA); R y-land v.

Daniels v campbell 2004

Did you know?

WebDaniels v Campbell NO and Others,[1] an important case in South African law, was heard in the Constitutional Court[2] on 6 November 2003, with judgment handed down on 11 March 2004. The applicant was a woman married in terms of Muslim rites, whose husband had died intestate. The court noted that Muslim marriages were not recognised in South … WebDaniels v Campbell 2004 (7) BCLR 735 (2004 (5) SA 331 ) (CC) 279 Dawood, Shalabi and Thomas v Minister of Home Affairs 2000 (8) BCLR 837 ) (2000 (3) SA 936 ) (CC) 280 Du Plessis v Road Accident Fund 2003 (11) BCLR 1220 (2004 (1) SA 359 ) (SCA) 279 Du Toit v Minister of Welfare and Population Development 2002 (10) BCLR

WebCampbell and Others. Daniels v. Campbell and Others. The applicant was a woman married according to Muslim rites and whose husband had died intestate. The marriage … WebDaniels v Campbell 2004 5 SA 331 (CC) Dawood v Minister of Home Affairs; Shalabi v Minister of Home Affairs; Thomas v Minister of Home Affairs 2000 3 SA 936 (CC) Du Toit v Minister for Welfare and Population Development 2002 10 BCLR 1006 (CC) Ex parte Soobiah: In re Estate Pillay 1948 2 All SA 76 (N)

WebDec 15, 2024 · Daniels v Campbell NO and Others, an important case in South African law, was heard in the Constitutional Court on 6 November 2003, with judgment handed down … WebFeb 28, 2024 · In Daniels v Campbell 2004 (5) SA 331 (CC), the Constitutional Court confirmed that the word "spouse" in the MSSA includes widows from monogamous Muslim marriages and that such wives, therefore, had rights to claim maintenance from the estates of their deceased spouses.

WebDec 21, 2024 · The SCA quoted from the judgement of Moseneke J in the Daniels v Campbell NO and Others 2004 (5) SA 331 (CC) case as follows: ‘This “persisting invalidity of Muslim marriages” is, of course, a constitutional anachronism. It belongs to our dim past.

Web12 Currie and De Waal Bill of Rights Handbook 66; Daniels v Campbell 2004 7 BCLR 735 (CC); 2004 5 SA 331 (CC). 13 Coetzee v Government of the RSA, Matiso v Commanding Officer, Port Elizabeth Prison 1995 10 BCLR 1382 (CC); 1995 4 SA 631 (CC) para 16; Case v Minister of Safety & Security, Curtis v cindy johansonWeb7 Daniels v Campbell NO and Others 2003 (9) BCLR 969 (C) at 973F-G. 8 The Master made the appointments in terms of section 18(3) of the Administration of Estates Act 66 … diabetic anodyne shoesWebDaniels v Campbell 2004 (5) SA 331 (CC) Delfante v Delta Electrical Industires Ltd 1992 (2) SA 221 (C) Echodelta Ltd v Kerr & Downey Safaris (Pvt) Ltd 2004 (1) SA 508 (ZHC) Enslin v Gallo 1984 (1) PH 27 (D) Ex parte Kajee 2004 (2) SA 534 (C) Fedlife Assurance Ltd v Wolfaardt 2002 (1) SA 49 (SCA) diabetic answer athelic mens shoesWebIN THE CONSTITUTIONAL COURT OF SOUTH AFRICA JuleigaDaniels v Robin GrieveCampbell NO and Others Case CCT 40/ Decided on 11 March 2004 Media … cindy johnson columbia tnDaniels v Campbell NO and Others, an important case in South African law, was heard in the Constitutional Court on 6 November 2003, with judgment handed down on 11 March 2004. The applicant was a woman married in terms of Muslim rites, whose husband had died intestate. The court noted that Muslim marriages were not recognised in South African law. It concluded that this violated section 9 of the Constitution. Accordingly, it was held that the applicant could inherit. Th… diabetic anthropologyWebDaniels v Campbell NO 2004 (7) BCLR 735. Datec Electronic Holdings td v United Parcels Service Ltd [2005] 1 Lloyd's Rep 470. De Kock v Van Rooyen 2005 (1) SA 1 (SCA) De Kock v Van Rooyen 2005 2004 (2) SACR 136. Director of Public Prosecutions, Cape of Good Hope v Robinson 2005 (4) SA 1 (CC) cindy johnson glen rose texasWebHeard on : 6 November 2003 Decided on : 11 March 2004. JUDGMENT SACHS J: [1] This case concerns an application for confirmation of an order, 1 and, in the. ... 8 the second … cindy johanning cbp homes