WebSep 28, 2001 · Danial Latifi v/s Union of India Writ Petition (C) No. 868 of 1986 Decided On, 28 September 2001 At, Supreme Court of India By, THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE G.B. PATTANAIK By, THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE S. RAJENDRA BABU By, THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE D.P. MOHAPATRA By, THE HONOURABLE MR. … WebJudgment: Daniel Latifi judgment basically revived the principles settled in Shah Bano case that, the husband’s liability to maintain his wife doesn’t end with the iddat period. However, it explained this principle, not as contravening the Act which was enacted as a result of the Shah Bano case, as a commentary on that Act.
Muslim Women (Protection of Rights on Divorce) Act 1986
WebAug 22, 2024 · DANIAL LATIFI VS UNION OF INDIA JUDGEMENT ANALYSIS FACTS The case follows its pursuit from the famous case of Mohd. Ahmed Khan vs Shah Bano … WebSep 16, 2024 · Judgment Analysis – DANIAL LATIFI VS UNION OF INDIA; 498A Acquittal in Trial Entitles Divorce on Ground of Cruelty; Not Providing Maintenance is a Continuous Offence; Arun Singh vs State of UP; Search. Search for: Recent popular post. Judgment Analysis – DANIAL LATIFI VS UNION OF INDIA is bubblegum bad
Danial Latifi vs. Union of India, AIR 2001 SC 3958. SoOLEGAL
WebJul 15, 2024 · Danial Latifi & Anr. Versus Union of India Petitioner- Danial Latifi & Anr. Respondent- Union of India Statutes Referred- The Muslim Women (Protection of … WebJUDGMENT. ORIGINAL PDF. Danial Latifi And Another v. Union Of India . S. Rajendra Babu, J.—. The constitutional validity of the Muslim Women (Protection of Rights on … WebDANIAL LATIFI v. UNION OF INDIA ((2001) 7 SCC 740 : 2001 CriLJ 4660) Bench: G.B. Pattanaik, S. Rajendra Babu, D.P. Mohapatra, Doraiswamy Raju, Shivaraj V. Patil Decided on September 28, 2001. Introduction: After the landmark judgment of Shah Bano’s case, there was a chaos condition in the Muslim Personal Law. Also there was many political ... is bubblegum a sweet